On 1/7/11, Ilya Chernykh <
neptunia@mail.ru> wrote:
> On Friday 07 January 2011 14:13:44 Katheryne Draven wrote:
>
>> I agree. I think its better to work on getting konq to render better.
>> Its far superior as a web browser even with its outdated-ness (is that
>> a word?). 90% of the time I find pages render and function better than
>> in Firefox. I can control my browsing experience better as well by
>> shutting off tons of stuff whilst still maintaining a usable page.
>> There are so many advantages to konq as a file manager, ftp, sftp, and
>> WB that its worth the extra steps.
>
> In Konqueror JavaScript is brocken. Also using Konq as a browser interferes
> with the filemanagement function: for file management I disable the toolbars
> but for browser I need them. If to enable toolbars in Konq, they appear in
> all other profiles, and there is no way to disable them other than editing
> config files. Very annoying bug.
>
> Also Webkit is just newer than KHTML in KDE3 and receives security updates.
>