2011/12/16 Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey@gmail.com>:

>
>
> On 15 December 2011 18:01, L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2011/12/15 Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 15 December 2011 07:14, L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 2011/12/15 Nicolas Bercher <nbercher@yahoo.fr>:
>> >> > L0ner sh4dou a écrit :
>> >> >
>> >> >> You got me thinking about whole triselon thing. I did a two litte
>> >> >> sketches for trinity logo proposal.
>> >> >> First: http://db.tt/LwqZWTuP
>> >> >> Second: http://db.tt/YpivoAGk
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Maybe the "T" is not that much important and the logo could be
>> >> > designed
>> >> > without it.
>> >> >
>> >> > Nicolas
>> >> >
>> >> If we remove the t from the second one we will just get logo of
>> >> Trisquel linux. For the first one it's integral part of logo, without
>> >> it the space looks 'empty' to me.
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >> trinity-devel-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> trinity-devel-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
>> >> Read list messsages on the Web archive:
>> >> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
>> >> Please remember not to top-post:
>> >> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
>> >>
>> >
>> > I like the first one more than the second (reminds me of the trisequal
>> > logo
>> > to much, could be taken as far as a blatant rip off :x)
>> Same opinion here.
>>
>> >
>> > Does no one like the current trinity logo? I sort of like it actually :)
>> > But
>> > if I had to pick it would be the first one.
>> >
>> > I like the idea of the Gear. it reminds me of a hard working, well tuned
>> > machine designed for serious activities, rather than a less serious one.
>> Yes, but this gear is too strong reference to KDE, anyway we can have
>> a gear-like tooths in the logo (like in second example).
>> >
>> > Could you create this as an SVG? I could give it a whack.
>> >
>> Only If I learn how to xD
>> Anyway I'm more occupied by PKGBUILDs for arch ATM, so I will work on
>> this after I finish those. This was to gather some ideas, since I want
>> to create new webpage for trinity at some point (acutally second thing
>> on my TO-DO list, after PKGBUILDs)
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> trinity-devel-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> trinity-devel-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
>> Read list messsages on the Web archive:
>> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
>> Please remember not to top-post:
>> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
>>
>
> Aside from archlinux packages I'm also the defacto website designer, well
> sort of.
>
> I developed the current website ( a vast improvement from the previous one )
> and it's been quite careful.
>
> We don't want anything to much, or to little, to complicated or to simple.
> I think improvments would be more warranted the this scenario.
>

I was thinking on relaying completely on the wiki system we use for
whole site. It can be done.
And I think we should add some sort of news system in which we will
write what actually happens inside the project, so it don't seem dead.
If we add ability to comment those news it will be like saying to
users "we care about what you think!". User-frendliness. This can be
done by using plugin for the wiki system.
Generally the archlinux site is a great inspiration for me. It's
simple, looks good and has everything you need.