On Saturday 25 February 2012 18:06:00 Darrell Anderson wrote:
> > GHNS is cool.
> > I was thinking however, since scripts are small
> > in size, we could just at them as defaults. It doesn't
> > seem to be much overhead.
> >
> > What do you guys think of that?
>
> As I mentioned in a previous post, perhaps we vote and select a half dozen
> or dozen scripts to include in the default packaging. The default is the
> scripts are disabled but appear in the Settings configurations for the new
> user.

this would be ok, IMHO.

> The remainder of any scripts we want to support could be available at
> the wiki.

well, that was the point where I think GHNS makes much more sense.
I don't think normal users would regularly search a wiki for addons for
individual applications.

> This discussion now raises another point. If Trinity supports a Get Hot New
> Stuff option, should we check through all of the sources and update the URL
> to a Trinity location?

agreed - this way would also prevent to point to outdated/inexistent
locations, or those which are intended for kde4 only (thus incompatible with
trinity).

Werner