2011/11/25 Timothy Pearson <
kb9vqf@pearsoncomputing.net>
>
> > 2011/11/25 Robert Xu <
robxu9@gmail.com>
> >
> >> If the system administrators do this change, how will we accommodate
> >> Trinity to it?
> >> Fedora is doing it; openSUSE is having an argument about if this is good
> >> or not.
> >> Gentoo had a discussion on this, I think.
> >>
> >> Should this be treated like a simple "let's move to /usr/local" or has
> >> the renaming allowed us to install side by side with KDE4 without the
> >> use of /opt?
> >
> >
> > I have read this proposal some time ago, and even if don't entirely agree
> > with it because I don't consider it painless as everybody seems to
> > believe,
> > I think it can also lead to interesting possibilities.
> > It seems that /opt is not even considered in the plan. To me /opt doesn't
> > stink :) I think it's a reasonable short term solution, as long as $PATH
> > keeps working the traditional way (as it should for a long time).
> > Of course a complete rename of every application, binary, lib, man and so
> > on, to avoid any name collision with KDE, even installing in the same
> > paths, is the true long term solution. But I really don't know if this is
> > already the case. Timothy?
> >
>
> Renaming konsole and other applications will be very difficult, as the TDE
> userbase is quite familiar with the existing names. If I were to start
> renaming these applications I suspect I would have a mass migration to
> LXDE or another desktop entirely, as the learning curves will tilt in
> favor of a more mainstream desktop.