On 13 November 2011 11:05, Ilya Chernykh <anixxsus@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sunday 13 November 2011 19:59:20 Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:

> I agree here that Timothy's comment calling KDE:KDE3 obsolete is
> inappropriate. It seems he felt your response was harsh, but this does
> not make it appropriate for him to respond in such a way. I would have
> only expected a response asking for a diff.
>
> I understand it seemed inappropriate to you to be assigned to a bug in
> Trinity's bugzilla?

Of course it is strange to be assigned a bug and at the same time be banned, is not it?
If you want developers, you do not ban them.

You were assigned this bug because (Tim?) thought you were going to fix the API in your KDE:KDE3 repository, so we were hoping to incorporate patches from your tree. You then marked "CLOSED/WON'TFIX" and wrote "I am not a Trinity developer. I will not fix it in Trinity."

That said, can we leave this be? I do not understand why you persist! FOSS is all voluntary. If you don't like Timothy or his method, you're free to leave. If you want to help the project you need to 'play by the rules' so to speak. If you want to tear down the project and condemn us to the fiery depths of Hell, so be it. But then please do not do so on our mailing lists.

Calvin Morrison