On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Ilya Chernykh <neptunia@mail.ru> wrote:

On Friday 07 January 2011 14:13:44 Katheryne Draven wrote:

> I agree. I think its better to work on getting konq to render better.
> Its far superior as a web browser even with its outdated-ness (is that
> a word?). 90% of the time I find pages render and function better than
> in Firefox. I can control my browsing experience better as well by
> shutting off tons of stuff whilst still maintaining a usable page.
> There are so many advantages to konq as a file manager, ftp, sftp, and
> WB that its worth the extra steps.

In Konqueror JavaScript is brocken.

Indeed.

Also using Konq as a browser interferes
with the filemanagement function: for file management I disable the toolbars
but for browser I need them. If to enable toolbars in Konq, they appear in
all other profiles, and there is no way to disable them other than editing
config files. Very annoying bug.

Also true. Still, I find it that the whole departure to Dolphin in KDE4 was far from ideal still. Profile handling well would be better.

Also Webkit is just newer than KHTML in KDE3 and receives security updates.