On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Kristopher Gamrat <pikidalto@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:16 PM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz
<mckaygerhard@gmail.com> wrote:
> Toqueror ????
>
> O.o
>
> i dont think so
>
> maybe trinity for desktop name, and kfoo names change to qfoo, referending
> to QT backend based KDE libraries.
>

Quonqueror, Qonsole...

Somehow these still don't sound right. If we use the T idea, I
seriously doubt people would want to use amaroT.

I still think if we rename them, we should at least pick something
generic until we come up with a better name for rebranding, at least
for the development versions in svn whilst we work on new names. Then
we can rename stuff as we go along toward the rebranded stable
release, concentrating mainly on the main stuff.

I still like KDE Classic though. Perhaps we can see about doing a
co-operative with the KDE4 devs? I'm not sure where the co-op would be
(other than helping them "sanitize" their code and in adding in old
features they still need (once we're strong in numbers and have a few
more releases), but if they keep all their new "plasma" and such, I
doubt the two projects would actually merge for a KDE5).

--

Kris
"Piki"
Ark Linux Webmaster
Trinity Desktop Environment Packager

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messsages on the Web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting