On Sep 9, 2011 1:42 PM, "Ilya Chernykh" <anixxsus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Friday 09 September 2011 21:41:23 Calvin Morrison wrote:
>
> > > > I mean it is an integral part of a desktop and there is no viable
> > > > replacement. Therefore I vote that we should adopt it.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Call it good or bad but hal will never return to the distributions
> >
> > It doesn't matter to users if we provided the packages.
>
> Yes but it bars inclusion of Trinity into distributions.
>

Hal is only unsupported because it is unmaintained. If it was maintained, why would distributions not want to include it?