On Sereda 20 Lystopad 7532 01:43:47 deloptes via tde-users wrote:
> Roman Savochenko via tde-users wrote:
> > I know that.
> Well, I don't know. I would just use the default options. I would also not
> use /media, because media is used by the system to automatically mount
> devices (I guess it is true for udisks2).
There is no problem with options here, since they are accepted correctly, there is a problem with
missing options to control user of the mounted disk folder. And that missing is not the problem
also of tdestoragedevice.cpp in processing the mounting options, due to udisks doesn't allow
neither user, owner, uid or mask options.
> My understanding of your problem is that you create an entry in fstab and
> use udisks in the same time. The entry in fstab causes TDE to read this
> entry and omit udisks. Udisks does not need an entry in fstab anyway. So it
> looks to me TDE has the correct precedence and this must be right.
udisks can use /etc/fstab options to customize own behaviour and that is a single solution for FD
without fixing udisks itself. And most solutions in Internet about treating that behaviour of
udisks mean same appending an entry for FD to /etc/fstab, and TDE here tricks you starting use
mount directly!
udisks2 also can use /etc/fstab, and mediamanager.cpp wrongly overrides this feature!!!
In this case, I hope just one additional checkbox "prefer udisk(2) over fstab" will cover this use case?