> The crew that makes up who says what and who says what stays and goes, etc,
> all voted and it came out a tie and had to be broken. That alone told me
> enough that half the Debian crew thought it was a bad idea. That's what I
> looked at and I'll take that to heart.
Emotions are involved here, please read the final paragraph to find out what I think about that.
You are correct the vote was 4-4, 4 of the votes were employees of Canonical who created Upstart and upstart got 4 votes from those very same people. The other 4 votes had no ties at all to another distro or a pay packet.
>You might want to post up some proof Linus is allowing that abortion into his
>kernel. I haven't heard anything about that yet.
Emotions again, please read the final paragraph to find out what I think about that.
If you haven't heard it then why did Linus remove KS's upload privileges? If it wasn't because of his systemd uploads into the kernel, and the subsequent kernel crash issue and a coupe of bugs that everyone involved denied there coding was at fault, what was it for?
Now that is out of the way I'll comment on the emotional side of your reply., I am not interested in getting into an emotional slanging match. I don't want
to go there and would appreciate it if you didn't go there with me. I'm interested in facts not emotions." Taking things to heart" and calling things "abortions" are akin to emotional blackmail and it really does lower the discussion to the lowest common denominator