Personally, as a TDE user, I would like to see a focus on making TDE more polished and more robust. What it doesn't need is feature creep. Some modern niceties, sure, but what brought us back to TDE was a great desktop manager that WORKS. I would like to see it stay that way. If CPU cycles can be freed in the process, GREAT! If not, I don't see CPU's getting any slower.
> The TDE project appears to me to be short of developers,We would not release two versions of Trinity. I'm seeking only a team of people to investigate what can be done to create a Trinity Light. What features can be disabled during the compiling process? Which Control Center settings can be changed? Etc.
> money and other
> resources already. Would increasing the number of
> versions help with that???
The goal is to create a wiki article about creating Trinity Light. Who actually releases such a version is something downstream packagers and users decide.
As a close friend often would quip, those are the kinds of problems we want to have. :)
> I also often wonder whether those of us who are simply not
> capable of helping
> with the development, aren't just a millstone around the
> necks of those of
> you who contribute so much. Do you lot actually
> *want* users? We seem to me
> to add nothing other than problems!
Basically, more users should mean more developers too. But if not, more users is still a good thing. :)
Darrell
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messsages on the Web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting