@Timothy, if it is at all possible could you please remove the post with my screenshots. I didn't realise that by doing so I was braking rules and being rude.
If you or E. Liddell want a copy of the modified css I'll send it to you. If not that's fine.

On 18 October 2014 12:21, Michael . <keltoiboy@gmail.com> wrote:
That's fine Lisi I respect your opinion, I was just making sure you were not confusing things that were not part of the actual web page.

On 18 October 2014 12:18, Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2014 23:31:04 Michael . wrote:
> >Unlike you I am not in the least worried about the width.  What bothers me
>
> is
>
> >the clarity and legibility.  And the original version is much better.
> > Much better contrast and fewer colours that add no functionality at all.
> > (That unnecessary blue stripe that necessitates changing the colour of
> > the
>
> writing
>
> >so that the two stripes are different colours instead of uniform.  Tiring
>
> and
>
> >harder to read.)
>
> That "blue stripe" is a GTK theme and has nothing to do with the webpage.
> There is nothing on the webpage that is not on the original webpage. There
> is no change in content, colours, or anything else on the webpage at all.
> The only thing that was adjusted was the capacity to suit many screen sizes
> and this was done in the css by using percentages instead of fixed widths.
> There is no reason for you to change any font colour because of that "blue
> stripe".

For whatever reason, yours renders differently from the original and I like
the original better.

Lisi

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting