Would letting apt-get or aptitude uninstall everything it wants then trying to reinstall it all? I don't hold a lot of hope for this as this is what I was planning to do with the packages for the dist-upgrade, but this didn't work out so well...

--b

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Brad Alexander <storm16@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Greg,

I used apt-get, because thats what the squeeze release notes recommended.

What I did was apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade ; apt-get dist-upgrade.

apt-get -f install gives me a list of packages to deinstall, a good number of which seems to be trinity or trinity-related. I figure that aptitude full upgrade will deinstall as well.

--b


On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Greg Madden <gomadtroll@gci.net> wrote:

What method did you use to upgrade? apt-get, aptitude, synaptic ?  Using apt-get
from the cli has a couple of options.

The unmet dependencies could be caused by the method of upgrading,
 'apt-get dist-upgrade' allows installation of new dependencies, 'apt-get upgrade'
only upgrades existing packages. Also 'apt-get -f install' will try to 'fix' a
failed upgrade.

The release notes seem to prefer apt-get over aptitude, a reversal from the Lenny.
release. I normally try all cli install tools when something like this happens,
don't use gui stuff. My preferred package manager is still 'dselect' .
--
Peace,

Greg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messsages on the Web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting