Quotes from the article that were available to me:

"Note that after 2013 and release 3.5.13.2, Trinity switched its numbering system to avoid being dismissed because of its version number alone."

The above statement is absolutely untrue, at least for me. I genuinely feel sorry for any user that picks a desktop because of a version number, rather than functionality. 

As to functionality, TDE is faster than KDE Plasma, and actually displays folder contents the exact way I want to see them. I don't want to see a mix of folders and files when I am browsing the file system. Gnome seems to have banished the use of desktop icons, forcing the end user to remember the name of the application they want to use, so they can search for it. A lot of desktop space is wasted and time wasted searching rather than just clicking on what you want. And sometimes the command line for an icon should actually be edited. In Linux, sometimes, it is important to modify things so you can do what you want and how you want.

TDE does not lack an application search function. The only things I ever borrow from other desktops, that works well in TDE is are 1. network manager[1] application and 2. KDE connect.

"Trinity is included in few distributions, so the project cannot depend on maintainers from outside the project. Instead, the project includes downloads for images of several distributions configured to install Trinity. These include a number of images for Debian, Devuan, Red Hat, and Fedora. For convenience, the Long-Term Support (LTS) releases, such as Ubuntu 20.04 (Focal Fossa), are probably the ones to choose because newer releases may not support Trinity. In some cases, unofficial or testing versions may also be available. Yet another alternative is to install from source tarballs, which is the only choice for adding Trinity to an existing installation."

This is an unclear statement, but I personally know that there are several repositories for several distributions.

Oh wait, they added this later:

"Unless you install from source files, the installer for Trinity depends on the distribution used."

I really don't see how making images available for several distribution should amount to a criticism.

[1] I rarely use network manager because it has, at times, interfered with Postfix functionality, which I use to send fail to ban notices on desktops I have a way to remote into to administer.


On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 8:13 AM E. Liddell <ejlddll@warpmail.net> wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:39:58 +0200
Thierry de Coulon <tcoulon@decoulon.ch> wrote:

> On Tuesday 07 June 2022 15.24:45 James Leone wrote:

> Actually, reading the article I did not even find out what Trinity
> was missing (except that "modern look").

I was able to ferret out a few semi-specific complaints:

1. They couldn't find a UI for either system services or turning off
autostart bits of TDE (it's not entirely clear which they meant, or
even whether they do—or should—understand the distinction).

2. They couldn't figure out how to adjust the font size for desktop
icon captions (perhaps it needs a better label than just "Desktop"?)

3. They had unclear issues with the system tray, perhaps because
it was overpopulated.

4. The selection of *non*-TDE applications on whatever installer
or live media they used didn't match their preferences.

5. They dislike the application-names-start-with-K thing we
inherited from KDE.

1-3 are possibly actual problems, but the level of detail mostly isn't
good enough to follow up on.

E. Liddell
____________________________________________________
tde-users mailing list -- users@trinitydesktop.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@trinitydesktop.org
Web mail archive available at https://mail.trinitydesktop.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/users@trinitydesktop.org