> >> 2. Sync'd mirrors - Slavek, Tim, is there enough time to do this in
> >> 1 week or should we push release back further?
> >
> > I casually watching the situation of mirrors. It appears that now are
> > quite good old state (except for one):
> >
> > 1.
http://depot-trinity.dotriver.eu/
> > (winner) new packages copied, old not yet cleared
> > 2.
http://mirror.ntmm.org/trinity/
> > new packages copied, old not yet cleared
> > 3.
http://trinity.blackmag.net/
> > (best) new packages copied, old already cleared
> >
> > 4.
http://trinity.netlinux.org.uk/
> > (very bad) crashed a few times and a large part of the day after
> > crash the synchronization is not performed. At this pace will perform
> > synchronization for many days. It does not seem sensible to wait for
> > this mirror with a press release.
> >
> > Note: Mirror
http://ftp.rezopole.net/tde/ deliberately not mentioning
> > - it does not sync at all.
> >
> > Slavek
> > --
>
> We are now pretty much ready to release; the two mirrors you mentioned
> were automatically selected by the system for use and they both appear
> to be in sync. Does tomorrow (10/11/2012) sound good to all concerned?
>
> In case anyone was curious, I found the source of the extremely slow
> sync. Our nightly builds are far more popular than I thought;
> apparently between those and Slavek's PPA (neither of which are on the
> mirror system) there was not much bandwidth left over for the mirror
> sync.
>
> Tim
>