tde-devels January 2019

devels@trinitydesktop.org

5 participants
4 discussions

Preparation for work on translations
by Slávek Banko 01 Mar '19

01 Mar '19

Hi all, those of you who have been here for a long time might recall that when I joined the community I assumed that my tasks would be only two: backport patches to the stable TDE series and work on translation. Over time, it turned out that my tasks on the project would be bigger. However, work on translations is still a postponed task. Recently, I have devoted some time to the tasks that are essential to move us forward with the work on translations. Therefore, I would like to inform you about the results and related plans. I apologize for long email. 1. Unnecessary updates of POT files during package build I observed that during the DEB packages build, an attempt was made to update POT files. However, this step makes no sense. Bundling usually takes place in dedicated pure chroot. Therefore, the result of updating POT files would be discarded anyway. So this is unnecessary work. At the same time, the extractrc tool is used during the POT files update. But this tool is part of the tdesdk-scripts-trinity package. Therefore, when building other packages, it is usually not present. So updating POT files during building could not work well. That's why I already removed these unnecessary updates of POT files while building DEB packages. 2. Do we still need to use the old modified version of xgettext? I found out what the current status is and whether there are still reasons to use the old modified version of xgettext (kde-xgettext). Patches for the old version solve two things: a) adding a way to enter plural forms of strings b) adding a way to enter translation context The current versions of gexttext already have both of these options, but they seem to be implemented in a different way. Before we can start using standard xgettext in TDE, we will need to add support for a new way of plural forms of strings and translation contexts. So far, we need to continue using an old modified version of kde-xgettext. 3. Can modern gettext replace the extractrc tool? Modern versions of gettext can handle XML files. We use XML files for 'kcfg', 'rc' and 'ui'. Using ITS support in gettext, there is a way to define which texts are to be extracted for translations. I tested this option, but I encountered some problems: a) Tags are written in strings as html entities: < / > / &. After extraction using xgettext, are left in this form. But the extractrc tool convert them to the appropriate characters '<', '>', '&'. I did not find a way to do this with xgettext and ITS. b) XPath is used to determine which strings are to be extracted from XML files. Files 'kcfg' use their own XML namespace and I did not find a way how to enter XPath to work properly with ITS in xgettext. That's why I decided it was better to continue using the extractrc tool. 4. How do we create and update POT files? In order to provide strings for translation, we first need to create and update POT files. The best place for these files is right in the source code – in GIT. Therefore, these files need to be maintained independently of the building binaries. Therefore, it is obvious that for this task it is not a good time during the build binary packages, nor the usual use of Automake or CMake. Although the usual use of CMake with CMakeLists.txt for updating POT files is not a good choice, using CMake as such seems to be a good idea. CMake allows using the -P option to process a different file than the usual CMakeLists.txt. In this case, it does not create build folder, it does not create a cache - exactly as it suits us for our purpose. I decided to use the name CMakeL10n.txt. I have prepared the CMake module TDEL10n.cmake. This module provides functions for simplifing directories handling – function tde_add_l10n_subdirectory as the equivalent for add_subdirectory and function tde_auto_add_l10n_subdirectories as an equivalent for tde_auto_add_subdirectories. And above all, the tde_create_l10n_template macro that provides POT files generation. This macro provides some benefits that seemed useful: a) If resource files are processed – for example, *.ui, the work file "rc.cpp" is commonly used to save extracted strings for translation. This file is then processed by kde-xgettext. Links to the original location of strings in the resulting POT file then refer to this "rc.cpp", which is not very useful. The tde_create_l10n_template macro performs additional processing by replacing references to "rc.cpp" with references to the original resource files. Therefore, the POT file does not refer to a non-existent "rc.cpp" file, but to real locations in resource files. b) When a new POT file is generated, a comparison is made with the original POT file. If only the date of POT file generation is changed, the original POT file will be left unchanged. This prevents unnecessary POT file updates. This will allow to run a regular update of POT files without causing unnecessary commits. 5. What's next? For revisions and comments, I created a pull request containing a CMake module TDEL10n.cmake: https://mirror.git.trinitydesktop.org/gitea/TDE/tde-common-cmake/pulls/2 ...and pull requests with a demonstration of use CMakeL10n in two modules: https://mirror.git.trinitydesktop.org/gitea/TDE/abakus/pulls/1 https://mirror.git.trinitydesktop.org/gitea/TDE/tdebase/pulls/19 After testing, we will need to add CMakeL10n.txt to generate POT files in all other modules. Once we have automated updating of POT files, translation work can begin! 6. How can users work on translations? I will leave the answer to this question for later. Whoever was more attentive could have noticed in several earlier commits that "something is being prepared" :) Cheers -- Slávek

4 6

Bug 1834
by deloptes 29 Jan '19

29 Jan '19

Hi Michele, there was discussion on UL and I noticed that this bug is missing in the milestones (meta bugs) Can you please include it there? https://bugs.trinitydesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1834 thanks

3 3

[trinity-devel] peculiar power save in 14.1pre on 18.04.1 LTS
by Felix Miata 22 Jan '19

22 Jan '19

# inxi -Gxxb System: Host: gb250 Kernel: 4.15.0-42-generic x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 7.3.0 Desktop: Trinity R14.1.0 tk: Qt 3.5.0 wm: Twin dm: startx Distro: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS (Bionic Beaver) Machine: Type: Desktop System: Gigabyte product: B250M-D3H v: N/A serial: N/A Mobo: Gigabyte model: B250M-D3H-CF v: x.x serial: N/A UEFI: American Megatrends v: F9 date: 04/10/2018 CPU: Dual Core: Intel Core i3-7100T type: MT MCP arch: Kaby Lake speed: 800 MHz min/max: 800/3400 MHz Graphics: Device-1: Intel HD Graphics 630 vendor: Gigabyte driver: i915 v: kernel bus ID: 00:02.0 chip ID: 8086:5912 Display: server: X.Org 1.19.6 driver: modesetting unloaded: fbdev,vesa resolution: 2560x1440~60Hz OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel HD Graphics 630 (Kaby Lake GT2) v: 4.5 Mesa 18.0.5 compat-v: 3.0 direct render: Yes Network: Device-1: Intel Ethernet I219-V vendor: Gigabyte driver: e1000e v: 3.2.6-k port: f040 bus ID: 00:1f.6 chip ID: 8086:15b8 Drives: Local Storage: total: 238.47 GiB used: 26.39 GiB (11.1%) Info: Processes: 197 Uptime: 4h 11m Memory: 15.56 GiB used: 338.2 MiB (2.1%) Init: systemd v: 237 runlevel: 3 Compilers: gcc: N/A Shell: bash v: 4.4.19 running in: konsole inxi: 3.0.30 TCC -> System Administration -> Monitor & Display has nothing enabled. Thus I would expect no attempt from TDE to save power. Is this not the case? After 10 minutes, the screen blanks for several seconds, after which the desktop wallpaper reappears, but not the panel or open Windows. This happens whether the session is started from TDM or with startx. I see nothing in /etc/X11 to account for this, though I'm not sure what I would be looking for other than an Option "DPMS" statement in xorg.conf*. Is this to be expected? Should I file a TDE bug? -- Evolution as taught in public schools is religion, not science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/

3 3

[trinity-devel] schizoid greeter window on dual display setup
by Felix Miata 16 Jan '19

16 Jan '19

I do a lot of mix and match with displays and PCs. The one I have now booted to Sid has 2560x1440 and 2560x1080 displays on an old ATI dual DisplayPort PCIe card. I have the larger configured as primary and the smaller as upper via an xrandr script in /etc/X11/Xsession.d/. 14.0.6dev's first greeter appearance after booting is on the upper/smaller display, but moves to the lower/larger display on logging out. I'd rather it always be on the larger. Is this something configurable? If so, where & how? Is this something worth or needing a bug report? -- Evolution as taught in public schools is religion, not science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

tde-devels January 2019