/dev/shm/tdelibs/tdeio/tdeio/backtrace_symbols.c:57:22: fatal
error: demangle.h: No such file or directory
We ran into this before with tdebase and we added
DWITH_KDESKTOP_LOCK_BACKTRACE as a configure option in commit
936d3cec 2013-01-26.
demangle.h is not supported in all distros.
I'll try to massage 936d3cec into tdelibs.
Darrell
Michele Calgaro <michele.calgaro@...> writes:
>
> Hi there,
> after several months, I have started to rebuild TDE from the current GIT
> sources on Debian/Testing, but I have soon noticed that the "tde-packaging"
> repository is not up to date with the "tde" repository.
> Namely, when trying to build "tdelibs" I run into a broken dependency for
> "libart-2.0-dev" version >=14.0.0. The current files in the "tde-packaging"
> repository for "libart" builds to a version which is 2.3.22.
> I double-checked the nightly builds on the web site, and I saw that the
> correct package (version 14.0.0) is created.
> So my questions are:
> 1) is there a date already scheduled for an update of the "tde-packaging"
> repository, and if so when
> 2) otherwise, is there any other place where I can find the updated
> packaging files (other than download the .dsc and .tar.xz file for each
> package from the nightly build website and then extract the packaging
> scripts)?
>
> Thanks
> Michele
>
>
Hi there,
a few days have gone by since my original post, so I think it should be ok
to ask again.
Is there any place where I can find the updated packaging files for building
TDE for Debian/Jessie, other than extracting those from each package in the
nightly build website?
Thanks again
Michele
Hello,
we have recently added backends for setting power state using HAL and
DeviceKit-Power. Now I have prepared another backend - using tdehwlib dbus
daemon. The advantage is that it would not need any other external
dependency.
See bug report:
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1643
What do you think?
Slavek
>Everything I wrote is my plans and view of the situation. I've
>just intended to start a discussion...
>Sorry if it was sound too strongly.
I did not read your posts that way. :-) I realize English is not
the native language of many people. I try to read posts with the
benefit of doubt. I try to read posts with the presumption that
people are trying to improve existing conditions too.
I agree a discussion is relevant and important. Now that a
discussion is started, let's see how things unfold. :-)
Darrell
>> Hello, a typo in git hash 888a696a
>>
>> -/* This file is part of the KDE Display Manager Configuration
>package
>> +*/ This file is part of the KDE Display Manager Configuration
>package
>
>Fixed in GIT hash df510360.
>Thanks for warning!
Sorry about that. I have been staring at the typo for five minutes
and scratching my head. I have no idea how that happened or how I
was able to compile with the typo.
Darrell
Hello, a typo in git hash 888a696a
<http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1376773191:888a696a3d1c31bbd32c75f80a…>
is causing FTBFS in kcontrol/tdm/tdm-shut.cpp, because invalid syntax.
diff --git a/kcontrol/tdm/tdm-shut.cpp b/kcontrol/tdm/tdm-shut.cpp
index 2d8a565..5b295b5 100644
--- a/kcontrol/tdm/tdm-shut.cpp
+++ b/kcontrol/tdm/tdm-shut.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* This file is part of the KDE Display Manager Configuration package
+*/ This file is part of the KDE Display Manager Configuration package
Copyright (C) 1997-1998 Thomas Tanghus (tanghus(a)earthling.net)
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
Please fix it,
Thanks
Francois
>> Tim,
>>
>> A small problem that has bugged me for a while. On my HTPC I use
>> kdialog passive popups to remind me when a TV recording starts or
>> stops. This is helpful to me when I run XBMC because I run XBMC
in
>> full screen.
>>
>> Originally when I built my HTPC I used KDE 3.5.10. The popups
>> always appeared in front of XBMC, which satisfied my intent.
>>
>> Through the past many months I updated the HTPC: the operating
>> system from Slackware 12.2 to 14.0, KDE 3.5.10 to Trinity GIT,
>> Nvidia proprietary drivers, and XBMC from 9.01 to 10.1.
>>
>> The popups no longer appear in front of XBMC. When I toggle XBMC
>> from full screen to windowed mode I can see the kdialog popups,
but
>> not when XBMC is in full mode. The popups appear in front of
other
>> apps.
>>
>> This is not a killer problem. :-) I realize there are several
>> variables at play, but I don't know how the kdialog mechanism
>> works. I'd appreciate ideas for determining whether Trinity
(twin?)
>> or kdialog is the culprit.
>>
>Any chance XBMC is now using an override redirect window? If so,
>nothing would be able to pop up over the XBMC window.
>
>If XBMC is still using a traditional managed window, then my first
>suspect would be twin's focus stealing prevention.
>
>I hope this helps!
This is interesting. The kdialog passive popups are once again
appearing on top of xbmc. Same xbmc package as I had before so
something else changed in Trinity within the past 4 months, or
possibly in my configurations, although with the htpc I seldom
tinker with that. I wonder what fixed the problem....
Oh well, nice to see thenm working again! :-)
Darrell
>I believe that this is exactly what I pointed out earlier:
>http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::11083
Yes. I remember.
The culprit is the desktop lock process. When I reboot my systems
my shutdown scripts remove garbage and spurious files and cleans
/tmp. When I then first log into Trinity /tmp/tdesocket-global does
not yet exist. Invoking the desktop lock creates /tmp/tdesocket-
global.
I understand a process like TDM using /tmp/tdesocket-global, but
seems to me user-spawned processes such as desktop locking should
use $TDEHOME/socket-`uname -n`.
Bug report 1633 filed.
Darrell