A proposal: We rename 3.5.13.1 to 3.5.14 and release Real Soon Now. We rename R14 to R15.
We do some serious testing with the version changes to ensure our build scripts work. We set a goal to release 3.5.14 within a month. We stop twiddling our thumbs and move forward.
Few people are going to pay attention that 3.5.13.1 is available. Not to mention that after almost a year we release only an SRU version? People will pay more attention that 3.5.14 is available. Basic marketing psychology.
Yes, currently 3.5.14 (3.5.13.1) does not support a HAL-less system. We add Serghei's udisks support and run some serious short term testing. Even if udisks support is incomplete, within the month we advertise that 3.5.14 offers partial support for HAL-less systems and that R15 will provide full support.
The free/libre software world moves fast. Trinity has not been in the news in any meaningful way for almost a year. Users are not going to wait for Trinity. People forget.
The latest challenges with automounting means some serious work ahead before R15 can be released, not to mention that the bug tracker continues to grow with little resolution progress. We are falling behind.
Not a great image. We decide whether Trinity is going to move forward or become a niche piece of software used only by a relatively few people.
The longer we proverbially fiddle while Rome burns, the easier users forget about Trinity. We release 3.5.14 because we need a stable release, which 3.5.13 was not and the current R14 is not, and because we need to get Trinity back into the news.
The current R14 (proposed R15) has too many bugs and build issues to be considered for release in the near future. How long do we keep fiddling? We should release 3.5.14 Real Soon Now.
We get serious about releasing something Real Soon Now to keep Trinity in the news, or accept our fate as a niche project.
We can do this if we get serious. Or we keep picking the lint out of our belly buttons.
Basically, summer vacation needs to end. :-)
Thoughts?
Darrell
Hello
Sun, 20 May 2012 in trinity-users mailing I suggest to place on TDE's website in a visible place (eg between Downloads and Screenshots), a list of all distros that have Trinity as desktop environment in its ISOs. This suggestion was well received for users, but never taken into account. I launched this new proposal now in trinity-devel, to test for more luck ;) .
The list is:
* Exe GNU/Linux ( http://exegnulinux.net ): Debian live CD with graphical installation and only free/libre software by default.
* Fedora TDE Live ( http://trinity.blackmag.net/trinity/rpm/f17/trinity-3.5.13/ISO ): Fedora remaster with TDE.
* Porteus ( http://porteus.org ): Slackware based, the Slax's community continuation. It use TDE in the x86 version (KDE4 in the x86_64 version).
* Trinity-Kubuntu ( http://apt.pearsoncomputing.net/cdimages ): Ubuntu remaster with TDE.
* WifiSlax ( http://www.wifislax.com ): Slax / Porteus based with wireless security auditory focus.
Best regards!
Hi all.
As you probably noticed, I tried to solve the problem with style QtCurve. One
of the problems was compiling with Qt3 instead of TQt3. Unexpected problem is
the automatic substitution TQt => Qt that performs moc-tqt / tmoc. It affects
not only the classes and names from TQt3/Qt3, but all - in this case also
TQtCurveStylePlugin, TQtCurveStyle, TQtCurveConfig. But tqt.h of course does
not care nothing about these classes. And thus bringing into conflict
results 'moc' and source files 'h' and 'cpp'.
Therefore I wanted to ask if anyone would have any objections if I'll revert
all classes TQtCurve* back to QtCurve*?
Slavek
--
Anybody had any success building libkdcraw lately? I'm using the latest
from GIT, with tqt etc installed but I'm getting the following during
'configure'. The system is x86_64.
checking for Qt... configure: error: Qt (>= Qt 3.2 and < 4.0) (headers
and libraries) not found. Please check your installation!
As far as I can tell my system is setup correctly, other
libraries/dependencies (avahi-tqt, python-tqt, sip4-tqt etc, etc) find
the required libs & headers. I guess I'm doing something stupid or
missing something peculiar to libkdcraw?
Mike.
--
Any question is easy if you know the answer!
Latest GIT.
The check box widgets do not appear in Configure Desktop -> Behavior -> Device Icons
Both existing and fresh profiles.
Would somebody confirm?
Darrell
All,
This is just a quick note to let you know that the tdelibs ABI has been
changed as of GIT hash 2a415e3. This will require a full rebuild of all
libraries and applications which link against tdecore.
Tim
Slavek,
I'm sorry I missed your request on IRC (x-chat was running minimized) I have
corrected your name. (I think I'll blame Calvin for the screw-up, but it was
probably me :) It reads:
Slávek Banko: 3.5.13-sru developer, GIT maintainer, R14 backport selection and
integration.
Fixed:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trinity#Developers
Let me know of that is OK.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.