18 May
2011
18 May
'11
4:03 a.m.
Le Tue, 17 May 2011 21:23:42 -0500,
"David C. Rankin" <drankinatty(a)suddenlinkmail.com> a écrit :
On 05/16/2011 10:38 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
I did not review the largest patches (one of
the Debian ones has a size
of 1 MB; for such a size I just count on its Debian/Ubuntu test of
time :)).
If something seems unusual (e.g. that nastiness
you posted above),
please look through the tarball I posted to this thread earlier to
see if there are any patches that may have caused the problem. If
so, just let me know and I will reverse the patch in question.
Tim
Will do, I haven't had a chance to revisit Qt3 in the past few days.
Mickey? (/dev/ammo42) has done a good deal of looking at it. We will
have to compare notes and get a good bullet-proof baseline Qt3 setup
and see what patches can be added to the svn tree that will work with
*all* distributions + gcc46 to minimize the distro specific/x86_64
specific patches and build scripts.