16 Apr
2012
16 Apr
'12
4:02 p.m.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Julius Schwartzenberg julius.schwartzenberg@gmail.com wrote:
Timothy Pearson wrote:
Second, what, if any, kinds of bugs might result from using Qt:: rather than TQt::?
None really--it's a readability issue only.
Just a question out of interest. Wouldn't keeping Qt:: instead of using TQt:: make source compatibility with other KDE3 forks easier (regarding patches and so on)?
Agree. No reason for extra TQt spreading.