16 Apr
2012
16 Apr
'12
12:02 p.m.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Julius Schwartzenberg
<julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Timothy Pearson wrote:
Just a question out of interest. Wouldn't keeping Qt:: instead of using
TQt:: make source compatibility with other KDE3 forks easier (regarding
patches and so on)?
Agree. No reason for extra TQt spreading.
Second,
what, if any, kinds of bugs might result from using Qt:: rather
than TQt::?
None really--it's a readability issue only.