1 Sep
2012
1 Sep
'12
2:38 a.m.
On Saturday 01 of September 2012 04:15:53 Timothy
Pearson wrote:
OK, works for me with the justification given above. Rename away. :-)
Tim
I should mention that I am not opposed to
renaming the classes, I am
just
wondering if there might be a better name that won't conflict with a
different project.
I believe that it is useful consensus to use name QtCurve because also
gtk2-engines-qtcurve refer to the same name QtCurve. Without having had
anything to do with QT3 / QT4 / KDE. And in same manner also our
tde-style-qtcurve refer to the same style name QtCurve.
Renaming TQtCurve* classes to QtCurve* is a simplification of a technical
problem with the automatic renaming TQt=>Qt during build along with Qt3.
Slavek
--