22 Aug
2012
22 Aug
'12
5:43 p.m.
Tim,
please, can you review the patch
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/attachment.cgi?id=792 for bug 1180?
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1180
From my point of view is correct. But I do not know if it does not
interfere with SAK idea?
Slavek
As SAK support is a module and can therefore have its build disabled, your
patch is correct. There is no sense attempting to talk to a daemon that
is not only not running, but does not even exist on the user's system.
Tim