-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 01/31/2015 11:27 PM, Alexandre wrote:
Good point, the current colors are really old style IMO. The proposed colors looks better,
although I would make
the writing a little more visible. Another possibility would be to use a slightly pale
background instead of
white. Could you try a few variations and sned them in?
Yes. From the proposed
ones, the ones I prefer are either white or window background gray.
One thing: The horizontal lines and the text has only 1 common color setting. Also, maybe
reverse color (as we see
often for the percent text on a progress bar) could be good for the text, or having the
scale text at the left of
the graph, instead of in the graph.
Talking about the scales, I think that for the ram and swap graphs, the size could be
written in GB, not in MB,
since modern computers have much more ram than in the past. Also, when scales doesn't
fit mathematically on a
perfect number (as 1/3 = 0,333333333), I think that displaying 2 numbers after the point
is enough (as 0,33).
In general though, I think a rework of the current Ksysguard graph is what is really
needed. The ones from KDE4
and Gnome looks much better.
They look better, and they update the graph faster
than 1 time/second, so it appear to move much more smoothly.
Also, with the speed of modern computer, maybe some info is missed because of the slow
update.
By the way, your desktop background looks quite nice. Is it possible for you to share it
as well?
Of course, here it is:
http://opendesktop.org/content/show.php/Country-Road?content=168594
Thanks!
Cheers Michele
I also post a picture of the Win 8.1 task manager. While Win is not always the best OS, I
think that Win 8.1 task
manager is very well crafted, and could be inspired from if one day TDE's task
manager is to be redesigned. It
shows easily all the info I want to see in a task manager, separated by sections for ram,
cpu, hdd and network,
while still showing a little graph of each one, to see easily what happens with your
system.
Thank you! -Alexandre
I think the first version was better, IMO. Let's see if anyone else has any
comment, otherwise I will push that
version. Can you send in the modified files?
Cheers
Michele
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=LmJm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----