18 Nov
2011
18 Nov
'11
4:15 a.m.
On Thursday 17 November 2011 04:02:41 pm Kate Draven wrote:
On Thursday 17 November 2011, Sanne wrote:
Nothing saying you have to use Konqueror as a browser, there's the obvious
alternative of Firefox, and also Arora, and Dolphin for file manager :-)
The only real advantage of Firefox over Konqueror (besides the broken KHTML)
is more development of plugins, but that's only because they receive more
attention. I think, once KHTML is either fixed or replaced, we can get more
plugins developed :-)
--
Kristopher Gamrat
Ark Linux webmaster
http://www.arklinux.org/
I don't really hate anything. I'd prefer
to not have my file manager
mangled with a web browser, which admittedly I don't use anyway (I'm
using Firefox), but it's not really too important for me. As long as
Konqueror file manager keeps its awesome features, I'm happy. :)
Thanks,
Sanne
I agree with everything here, especially about konq, I also live in konq. I
do, however, like having konq as a web browser. I feel the html engine
should be fixed. Trust me there are some advantages konq has over FF as a
web browser.