20 Jan
2015
20 Jan
'15
10:35 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 01/21/2015 01:53 AM, Slávek Banko wrote:
Two spaces seem to me sufficient to good readability,
while there was no violated clarity.
Writing assignments and conditions in the 'for' without spaces results in
inconsistence style with herself. Or, if
you propose to remove spaces in assignments and conditions in all code, will make hard to
read all code.
For example - without spaces it simply disgust:
for (x=1,y=5; x<10&&y>0; x++,y--) { }
with spaces It's not beautiful, but at least readable:
for (x = 1, y = 5; x < 10 && y > 0; x++, y--) { }
Therefore, the use of two spaces seems to me the least painful. Just my two cents.
I also think the second is more readable than the first. Alternatively we can go
for
for (x = 1, y = 5;
x < 10 && y > 0;
x++, y--)
although it is a waste of vertical space IMO.
cheers
Michele
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=smeT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----