8 Dec
2014
8 Dec
'14
5:53 p.m.
Dne po 8. prosince 2014 Michele Calgaro napsal(a):
On 2014/12/08 06:51 PM, Slávek Banko wrote:
In this we agree - tag v14.0.0, branch v14.0.x.
Three months seemed like a good time. The good news is that builds for armel
and armhf are now significantly faster. Tim recently announced a change in
the mirror system. All this should speed up the process of releasing a new
version. The question therefore is whether we will have enough capacity to
fixing bugs. We can do this, we will assume that three months for release
14.0.1 and in the process we'll see if that's enough time.
--
Slávek
On Monday 08 of December 2014 10:34:32 Michele
Calgaro wrote:
I would go for v14.0.x, easier IMO.
By the way, is the idea of releasing a maintenance version (v14.0.x)
every 3 months or so still valid/accepted? Maybe given the freeze and
preparation time required, every 4 months would be more reasonable?
Minor releases (v14.y.x) would instead be released less frequently
(maybe once a year).
Cheers
Michele
On 2014/12/08 06:30 PM, Slávek Banko wrote:
I suppose after tagging can be created a branch. The name for the branch
v14.0.x or v14.0-sru? Or otherwise? On Monday 08 of December 2014 09:03:49 Timothy
Pearson wrote:
> All,
>
> TDE R14.0.0 is now in HARD FREEZE for release. I will be updating the
> version number and tagging R14.0.0 in GIT shortly.
>
> Tim
In the tag you remain current syntax == 'v14.0.0'? It's just that the
use of 'r' instead of 'v' would probably have had the effect that in
the listing were depicted as older - below under 'v3.5.13.x', which
would be confusing.
I also think v14.0.0 is better than R14.0.0.
By the way, beside tagging it, what are we going to do about branching?
Cheers
Michele