Perhaps it is worth do a complete check of what is
completed and
what not. That means check every single package.
I agree. How?
For example, dolphin was listed in the etherpad as completed. Yet I
compiled dolphin with cmake and no doc or po files were compiled.
Therefore I deleted the 'completed' tag in the etherpad and wrote a
note.
I know that not all components of amarok were converted and I filed
a bug report against that a very long time ago.
As I mentioned, the cmake packages do not build man pages. Another
bug report filed.
This is part of why I am suspicious of whether all packages have
been converted completely.
To my knowledge we no longer can build the core packages with
automake. Only cmake. Therefore the only file-by-file comparison we
can attempt is with a fully compiled 3.5.13.2 package. We have to
account for the renaming changes. Yet everybody builds packages
differently. Using a 3.5.13.2 package as a baseline does not mean
all components were compiled.
Darrell