5 Feb
2014
5 Feb
'14
12:37 a.m.
What's the downside of that?
On Feb 4, 2014 6:51 PM, "E. Liddell" <ejlddll(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 19:48:47 +0100
Slávek Banko <slavek.banko(a)axis.cz> wrote:
KMplayer is just an MPlayer wrapper, IIRC, and MPlayer's man page
still lists arts as an audio output target. It would probably be useful to
see if this is still viable (run "mplayer -ao arts [file]" from the command
line, and see if adjustment still affects the master volume--I don't use
arts,
and so can't test). If it works, KMPlayer can be tweaked to offer the
option if arts is installed.
This gets us no closer to solving the problem of a viable default video
player, though, unless we want to shift KMPlayer into tde-multimedia.
E. Liddell
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail:
trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messages on the web archive:
http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
>
KMPlayer for me very upset that the audio output does not use the
> arts. As a result, the volume controls 'master' instead to control
> only its own volume, as it does kaffeine.
>
> Slavek
> --
Sure, it is not necessary to use the arts. But it is a "bug" that instead
of its own volume KMPlayer affects the 'master' volume. I want to be able
to silence only video. But KMPlayer silences all. I remember when it was
possible to use the arts output, volume work "properly".