14 Apr
2012
14 Apr
'12
9:19 a.m.
Timothy Pearson wrote:
Just a question out of interest. Wouldn't keeping Qt:: instead of using
TQt:: make source compatibility with other KDE3 forks easier (regarding
patches and so on)?
Second, what,
if any, kinds of bugs might result from using Qt:: rather
than TQt::?
None really--it's a readability issue only.