15 Jan
2012
15 Jan
'12
10:14 p.m.
On Sunday 15 January 2012 05:03:25 pm /dev/ammo42 wrote:
See this page here:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2006-November/011874.html
Note that I have not tried this myself, as the Debian build system is
quite different from manually building from source.
Tim
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:42:59 -0500
Baho Utot <baho-utot(a)columbus.rr.com> wrote:
maybe,
Doing make dist from in the git repo to get a tarball almost always
results in
something usable and scriptable ;)
On Sunday 15 January 2012 02:44:08 pm Darrell
Anderson wrote:
There is no processing from VCS to tarballs like autoreconf when cmake
is used, so git-archive should be enough.
> If not then please keep the autotool files so source tarballs can be
> made from the git repos.
> > Try the attached patch. Ubuntu doesn't
use gamin and
> I haven't noticed
> the problems you are experiencing with respect to files not
> showing up,
> but it is a good idea to enable this feature nevertheless.
Thanks Tim!
I see that I was close but still have much to learn. :)
The package now builds. I'll report in the bugzilla my testing
results.
BTW, I think this is an example of why we should keep the automake
files in the GIT tree even after converting to cmake, at least for
a few more Trinity releases. Those files provide us a historical
record. In this case, I was able to study the automake files to
offer a feeble attempt at a patch. The historical automake files
provided me clues that the missing FAM support might be part of the
original bug. So let's keep those files for a while. :)
+1 on keeping autotool files
Does the current cmake files allow for make dist?