1 Sep
2012
1 Sep
'12
2:15 a.m.
Hi all.
As you probably noticed, I tried to solve the problem with style
QtCurve.
One
of the problems was compiling with Qt3 instead of TQt3. Unexpected
problem
is
the automatic substitution TQt => Qt that performs moc-tqt / tmoc. It
affects
not only the classes and names from TQt3/Qt3, but all - in this case
also
TQtCurveStylePlugin, TQtCurveStyle, TQtCurveConfig. But tqt.h of course
does
not care nothing about these classes. And thus bringing into conflict
results 'moc' and source files 'h' and 'cpp'.
Therefore I wanted to ask if anyone would have any objections if I'll
revert
all classes TQtCurve* back to QtCurve*?
Slavek
--
I think the upstream QtCurve project is progressing for Qt4 and KDE4;
wouldn't the proposed rename bring our version into naming conflict with
their version?
Tim