Been a long time since we discussed gcc hidden
visibility for symbols.
Last I remember, this was supported in (T)Qt3, arts, tdelibs, and tdebase.
I tried building my normal package suite with this option enabled in every
package. Some packages built but ignored the configure option. Some failed
to build. Some built and there were no messages at all about the option.
Removing the option from the failure group allowed the packages to build.
For the latter group, as no errors or build failures occurred, I presume
the option is supported.
Still, is this a good idea? I read a bit about the topic and the
information is way over my head. The only thing I do understand is using
the option is supposed to reduce libary size and improve loading speeds.
Darrell
Yes, hidden symbols are a good thing and are enabled by default .on the
Debian/Ubuntu builds. I am somewhat surprised that you have encountered
build failures; which modules failed to build?
Tim