Re: [trinity-devel] digikam FTBFS - libpng15 patch regression or not applied?

27 Jun 2012

...
   (I'm
confused why the preprocessor checks were not needed.)  
 They are not needed because the original code in Digikam was
 redundant. The patch simply removed the redundancy! 
Ok. You're dealing with a C++ dunce here, remember? I still don't grasp pointers,
->, this, and other C++ related weirdness.

Because both David and I built digikam against libpng 1.5 and 1.4.9 respectively, with the
preprocessor check patch, apparently the checks did not cause any harm but are
unnecessary.

I guess nice try but I'm still a C++ dunce. :-)

Darrell

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

Re: [trinity-devel] digikam FTBFS - libpng15 patch regression or not applied?