The sequence
went something like this, IIRC:
A few emails back, Alexandre asked that I underline the headers, because
he
didn't think they were sufficiently differentiated.
I didn't want to underline them because I was afraid it would suggest that
the
other links weren't links, if you see what I mean, so I italicized them
instead.
It was all mixed in with the discussion about the drop shadow.
E. Liddell
OK, thanks for the info. Alexandre, do you see a problem with making the
headers non-underlined and non-italic? The color differences set them
apart well enough for me.
Also, while I haven't had time to evaluate a proper overhaul of the patch
pages I have at least modified the backend so as to allow pagination.
Patches are now available by default in 100-patch lists, starting with the
newest. Everything else currently functions the same as before.
E. Liddell, now that the patches page is a little easier to work with, can
you send me an example of what the aforementioned css-driven table should
look like? I can implement the changes quickly on this end.
Thanks!
Tim
Hi,
Even if I see well my colors, the color difference is not 100% evident to me, but with the
italic text, it is more visible. Also, if the user is noodle enough to not know that it is
a link, then too bad for him... But it is not such a big matter in the end...
Also, can you replace the TDE logo with a well resized one, to avoid blur?
Thank you!
-Alexandre