7 Jan
2012
7 Jan
'12
2:51 p.m.
On Sunday 08 January 2012 00:11:15 Darrell Anderson wrote: [...]
This tells the user exactly what is being built. If the user wants something else, he has a basis to determine what is missing (or extra) and make the appropriate changes.
Yes, this sounds palatable. As upstream providers we need to test everything. Right now doing that is cumbersome. I understand that individual packagers don't want everything enabled. I don't either, but I am looking at this as an upstream provider and not just a packager. We can't test everything if most of the features are disabled by default.
Actually I do not understand the problem. If you want to check all features, enable they.
--
Serghei