16 Apr
2012
16 Apr
'12
12:06 p.m.
On 04/16/2012 12:02 PM, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Julius
Schwartzenberg
<julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Timothy Pearson wrote:
>>> Second, what, if any, kinds of bugs might result from using Qt:: rather
>>> than TQt::?
>>
>> None really--it's a readability issue only.
>
> Just a question out of interest. Wouldn't keeping Qt:: instead of using
> TQt:: make source compatibility with other KDE3 forks easier (regarding
> patches and so on)?
I just think it's a bit silly that there are multiple KDE3 forks. I
don't see how our project has any incentive to keep our code the same.
Since the changes are nominal, a quick search and replace will probably
make it usable with other kde3 versions.
But seriously, can't we just pool our resources together and not split
up? That's the problem with many splinter groups, they keep splintering
up and up until there is nothing left and nobody is happy.
Calvin