With SVN I used a package naming scheme based upon the previous official release number
and SVN version:
kdebase-3.5.12-125202-i486-1.txz
With the official tarballs the package name excluded the SVN version:
kdebase-3.5.13-i486-1.txz
I expect to continue that naming scheme with official release tarballs, although the
version numbers change:
kdebase-r14.0-i486-1.txz
Enter GIT.
GIT uses a weird hash number for each patch version. Is there a more straightforward
version number? Or will I have to start naming GIT builds using a date and time scheme?
kdebase-20120101_2200-i486-1.txz
More generally, should we adopt a common package naming scheme, as much as possible within
the limitations of each distro's package naming conventions? Might be nice if all of
us use a somewhat similar naming scheme.
Ideas? Comments?
Darrell