Praises and a little disappointment[?] blog entry.

This article surfaced on our IRC channel through <NachPlus> I read whole thing and this is the guy that seems to understand why we are keeping trinity alive. But I didn\t like the last paragraph. It seems that he blames re-branding of trinity. I think we should explain clearly why this was done either in the about page or in the FAQ. I already added question about this to the FAQ Draft in etherpad, but honestly, I didn't really know how to ask this kind of thing, nor explain this... This kind of criticism isn't really constructive, and we should have all the tools we need to fight against any kind of un-constructive, and unreasonable blaming either in the faq or in the about page IMO.