On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:48:37 -0500 "Timothy
Pearson"
<kb9vqf(a)pearsoncomputing.net> wrote:
>>> Should the kstyle directories and files be changed to
tdestyle?
>>Probably. How much would that break at
this point though
>>configuration wise?
>
>I don't know. I'm not complaining. :-) I only noticed the
>differences when I was responding to bug report 1609. Seems we
>have
>moved far with so much renaming and of late we have continued
some
>mopping up of those efforts. :-)
>
>A quick scan of modules that install files to
>$PREFIX/share/apps/kstyle:
>
>tdelibs
>tdebase
>tdeartwork
>tdesdk
>
>I don't have all packages installed right now so there might be
a
few more.
Other loose ends include renaming $TDEHOME/share/apps/kstyle-
>tdestyle, where ever that is defined (tdelibs?), and r14-xdg-
update. Probably other loose ends too.
I notice when grepping the sources some internal functions of
kstyle* still exist. tdebase/kpersonalizer has cpp files with
kstyle8.
I could hammer out and test the patches. The grunt work of the
patches should go fine, but I'd need a some days of validating
build runs and usability testing. If I get overwhelmed I holler.
Probably first scream and cry, but eventually holler. :-)
Creating patches went surprisingly smooth. The final list is
short:
tdelibs
tdebase
tdeartwork
tdesdk
tde-style-lipstik
tde-style-qtcurve
koffice
tde-i18n
I had no build errors. A superficial test of selecting the
styles
in kcontrol resulted in no errors or problems.
Caveat: The tde-i18n patch is huge. So huge that I will not even
try to post the patch or try to push to git until I reduce to
smaller patches and push piece-meal one at a time.
That said, how do we want to proceed next? I can post the
patches
online and somebody else could test. Or I could
just push to git
and listen for screams of pain and anguish. No problems noticed
here, but I'm only one person with my own perspective.
Darrell
Slavek, can you handle updating the Debian/Ubuntu packaging files
for this change?