Hi all.
As you probably noticed, I tried to solve the problem with style QtCurve. One of the problems was compiling with Qt3 instead of TQt3. Unexpected problem is the automatic substitution TQt => Qt that performs moc-tqt / tmoc. It affects not only the classes and names from TQt3/Qt3, but all - in this case also TQtCurveStylePlugin, TQtCurveStyle, TQtCurveConfig. But tqt.h of course does not care nothing about these classes. And thus bringing into conflict results 'moc' and source files 'h' and 'cpp'.
Therefore I wanted to ask if anyone would have any objections if I'll revert all classes TQtCurve* back to QtCurve*?
Slavek
I think the upstream QtCurve project is progressing for Qt4 and KDE4; wouldn't the proposed rename bring our version into naming conflict with their version?
Tim