I think for the immediate future (2+ years or so?) that Trinity should not get fancy with
logos or cuteness.
Tim has already modified the traditional KDE3 logos and substituted the K with a T. That
provides acknowledgment of roots distinguishes Trinity from KDE3. Simple and
straightforward.
In two to three years, if Trinity is alive and well, then perhaps a new logo should be
considered.
Darrell
--- On Thu, 3/17/11, jamesg(a)dimensionality.com <jamesg(a)dimensionality.com> wrote:
From: jamesg(a)dimensionality.com
<jamesg(a)dimensionality.com>
Subject: Re: [trinity-devel] Mascot and logo, Proposal 1
To: trinity-devel(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 12:08 PM
David C. Rankin wrote:
I also tossed out the idea of a Phoenix as a
logo/mascot "A phoenix dies
a fiery death but then rises again from the ashes." A good
KDE3-Trinity
analogy. (plus a pretty cool looking logo)<
Questions: Does the Phoenix represent what we will be in 5+
years? Do we
want to be known for rising up from ashes; do we want to be
known for what
we aspire to? Is the Phoenix overused? Is there
something similar to a
phoenix that might accurately represent what we aspire to?
Questions for the Potato Head concept: does the abstract
concept of
something fun (possibly even silly) and highly configurable
fail to
represent what we will be in 5+ years? Does it fail
to clearly describe
what we might aspire to? Is there something that
might be similar to this
with more possibilities that I've not thought of?
Questions for this guy:
http://imagebin.org/143360
Does it look too alien? Is it uninteresting when it stands
at attention
like this? Does ambiguity about whether it's a robot or
something else
make it less memorable? Is there a better way to
implement the Mr Potato
Head concept?
I'm pushing for the mascot before a logo because I believe
it to be the
less challenging problem to. I definitely am not
seeking any sort of
commitment at this stage, lest we get locked into a
suboptimal choice.
I presented L315 as something to throw tomatoes at.
8) Tell me what's
wrong, boring, irritating, or whatever with it. I
need to know so I can
present a better idea. It might even inspire someone
else to iteratively
piece together a better solution. Admittedly as this
is a marketing
problem rather than an engineering one, what's good and bad
can run the
risk of being too subjective...
http://www.dilbert.com/fast/2001-01-17/
Discussion from IRC indicates the possibility of exploring
the idea of a
robot that already has all the features the user might be
wanting. It may
take a few days for me to come up with something for
that. Obviously an
open brainstorm for possible directions might also help
with results.
Our mascot might not convey everything I'm hoping for in
the end, but it
would be good for it to have a hopefully inspiring meaning
behind it.
If we come up with something that would look good playing
tennis with Tux,
that's obviously a bonus... 8)
James Gholston (Strangelv)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messsages on the Web archive:
http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting