10 Nov
2013
10 Nov
'13
5:51 a.m.
On Thursday 07 of November 2013 00:01:55 Timothy
Pearson wrote:
release
I was looking for using renamed tools in the entire GIT tree, and I did
not
find anything where were actively used. So it looks good.
Slavek
So the Qt3/TQt3 conflicts are now sufficiently resolved for R14?
Tim
On Sunday
13 of October 2013 22:04:32 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> > Hello all, Tim,
> >
> > in a recent test of upgrade from TDE 3.5.13.2 to R14 smooth update
was
> > thwarted by conflicts in packages qt3 ×
tqt3. How should they be
>
> treated?
>
> > Rename files to prevent conflicts? Or mark packages as conflicting
/
> > replacement to allow smooth upgrade?
>
> We may need to rename the files, though this would push release back
yet
> again. My primary concern is the complaints
we would get if we
blocked
installation of Qt3 on TDE systems via the Conflicts package field.
At first glance the files listed are not used by the majority of TDE
applications, so renaming them might not be as bad as it first looks.
Let
me see what I can do with it.
Tim
I believe that it would be good to resolve this conflicts before RC1.
Should I help?
Slavek
I just pushed through a commit that should resolve the majority of these
issues. I don't know if the TDE sources will need to be updated
anywhere
to handle these changes; can you take a look?
Thanks!
Tim