Dne po 3. března 2014 Darrell napsal(a):
this is to
remind everybody that as of today, R14.0.0 has been
declared feature-frozen (soft-freeze). No new apps, kde->tde renames,
major enhancement will be included in R14.0.0 and they will have to
wait for the next release.
I have a pytdeextensions patch I finished yesterday that does nothing
but kde->tde and qt->tqt renames. I can push or open a bug report.
Based upon everything I saw , I suspect nobody uses pytdeextensions
anyway.
pytdeextensions is necessary for tde-guidance. And tde-guidance now FTBFS.
This is not good.
Once the list
is fully completed and agreed upon, we should make it
the official list and IMO we should declare R14.0.0 as hard-frozen.
I think we ought to play wack-o-mole and get a nice hunk of bugs
resolved before moving to hard freeze.
I agree - not good freeze when serious bugs. For example, as of now FTBFS
in kchmviewer and tde-guidance.
In the
meantime, feel free to suggest what bugs you would like to see
fixed in R14.0.0 and if you are willing to work on any of them.
Please keep in mind that we want to keep the list as short as
possible, in order to release R14.0.0 in a timely manner. Therefore
bugs should fit in one of the next categories (in order of priority):
- blockers
- criticals
- cause major loss of functionality to the system or to the user
- results in loss of functionality that could affect R14 release
reviews negatively (such as help buttons not working for example)
Please do not suggest bugs that do not fit in one of these
categories.
Every time this kind of discussion arises I am the lone voice that is
ignored. Everybody focuses on Blocker and Critical bugs. The bug list
needs to include paper cut issues.
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=
Regressions&list_id=237
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=
stdout%2Fstderr&list_id=236
For this reason, I'm not sure if just now he have to deal with KXMLEditor
and Katesort plugin. There are several other applications on which
François worked hard, and which also waiting for inclusion into GIT. The
only difference is that around them at present is not such a stir.
For example, for me, is critical twinkle. Francois on it did a lot of
effort, but because it is a complicated application, its integration I've
had to postpone - regardless of the fact that "for me" is critical.
Darrell
--
Slavek