Re: [trinity-devel] Codebase formatting discussion

On Saturday 17 of January 2015 15:59:19 Slávek Banko wrote: Wow, now I noticed a great debate about the spaces / no-spaces on Ehterpad. I prefer to continue the discussion here. I would say that there already was a consensus regarding spaces in the assignments - ie "a = b + c" and already there was a consensus regarding spaces around operators in conditions such as if, while - ie "if (a == b)". All was fine until we had a case of 'for'. At its core, it does not contain anything new - uses the assignment and uses conditions => for both there already was a consensus. So one would expect that there is no problem. Michele proposed: for (i = 0; i < 1; i = i + 2) { } advantage - is fully in line with already agreed practices disadvantage - are harder to distinguish the individual 'for' expressions Tim proposed: for (i=0; i<1; i=i+2) { } advantage - are well distinguishable individual 'for' expressions disadvantages - difficult to read individual 'for' expressions as such - is inconsistent with already agreed practices I understand Tim's argument. But that we would either to 'for' give exemption from other rules - which does not sound too good, or we would have to change already agreed rules - which is even worse option. I really would not want to because of the 'for' reduce the readability of all other conditions and assignments. But there is another thing - more complex 'for' where individual parts can contain more assignments and more conditions - in such cases Tim's argument will be less important - on the contrary will be greater problem reduced readability each expressions as such. Therefore I have two proposals: 1) As with the 'if' use 'excessive' brackets: for ((i = 0); (i < 1); (i = i + 2)) { } 2) More complex 'for' break into lines: for ((i = iteratorInicialization(arg)); (i != iteratorEnd(arg)); (i = iteratorNext(arg))) { } What do you think about that?