Timothy Pearson wrote:
I think all of us would appreciate it if you do
not come on the list
with
accusatory statements regarding articles you found on the Internet.
Actually, in that initial e-mail, there were definitely no accusations
as far as I could see. There was only a polite question for a reply from
the Trinity side. Also that's why I replied directly to it.
The accusations start at the third message (well before I joined the
conversation):
If it weren't for those remarks I would have remained silent and just let
the thread continue on its merry way.
Tim