22 Feb
2011
22 Feb
'11
1:19 p.m.
On 02/22/2011 11:41 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
<snip>
cc: arch-general
Arch devs - Do you think this could be a packaging/patch issue with Arch, or do you think is going to be glibc itself? It looks like glibc to me, but I thought I'd ask first before going to the glibc folks.
We are homing in on the cause and a possible solution:
<quote>
glibc 2.13-4 introduced a patch from the Fedora glibc branch that is not included in mainline glibc and fixes issues with prelink [1]. Obviously, this has some side effects. Seems like it requires some more investigation.
[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22656
</quote>
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.