On 18 June 2012 18:52, E. Liddell <ejlddll(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
Darrell Anderson <humanreadable(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
tdelibs/pics/crystalsvg/cr64-mime-koffice.png
tdelibs/pics/crystalsvg/cr22-mime-koffice.png
tdelibs/pics/crystalsvg/cr128-mime-koffice.png
tdelibs/pics/crystalsvg/cr48-mime-koffice.png
With respect to these, it is still *K*Office, right?
You just need the logo changed?
(Also, I'm making the primary changes to
crsc-mime-koffice.svgz, which wasn't on your list but needs the update anyway, and
will export the fixed-size pngs from that. As a bonus, we get a
nice SVG rendering of one of those problem logo-icon-things, which can be
reused in other places.)
Yes, thanks for seeing the svgz. Most of the crystalsvg png images likely have a parent
svgz. If
you can edit the svgz and produce the pngs from that then great. That is how I hoped these
exercise
would go: edit once, save many! :-)
Okay, here are bottom2.png, kde_logo.png, the various mime-koffice images
(22px isn't such a great image, but other methods of scaling it down didn't
produce anything better), and, as a bonus, the extracted logo as both .svgz and
a .png with transparent background. With a little luck, having a drop-in
replacement logo will speed up some of the other fixes (although there are some
places it may not work all that well compositionally).
Anyway, I'm done for the evening. Hopefully, I'll be able to resume tomorrow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messages on the web archive:
http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
Just a comment on the style - Trinity's T logo is all right angles. In
these images, the T is slanted (a bit more stylish, but definitely
different).
Do we use the boring yet context confirming and familiar 90 degree
angles, or go with a smooth stylish version?