Should the kstyle directories and files be changed to tdestyle?
Probably. How much would that break at this point though configuration wise?
I don't know. I'm not complaining. :-) I only noticed the differences when I was responding to bug report 1609. Seems we have moved far with so much renaming and of late we have continued some
mopping up of those efforts. :-)
A quick scan of modules that install files to $PREFIX/share/apps/kstyle:
tdelibs tdebase tdeartwork tdesdk
I don't have all packages installed right now so there might be a few more.
Other loose ends include renaming $TDEHOME/share/apps/kstyle-
tdestyle, where ever that is defined (tdelibs?), and r14-xdg-
update. Probably other loose ends too.
I notice when grepping the sources some internal functions of kstyle* still exist. tdebase/kpersonalizer has cpp files with kstyle8.
I could hammer out and test the patches. The grunt work of the patches should go fine, but I'd need a some days of validating build runs and usability testing. If I get overwhelmed I holler. Probably first scream and cry, but eventually holler. :-)
Creating patches went surprisingly smooth. The final list is short:
tdelibs tdebase tdeartwork tdesdk tde-style-lipstik tde-style-qtcurve koffice tde-i18n
I had no build errors. A superficial test of selecting the styles in kcontrol resulted in no errors or problems.
Caveat: The tde-i18n patch is huge. So huge that I will not even try to post the patch or try to push to git until I reduce to smaller patches and push piece-meal one at a time.
That said, how do we want to proceed next? I can post the patches online and somebody else could test. Or I could just push to git and listen for screams of pain and anguish. No problems noticed here, but I'm only one person with my own perspective.
Darrell
Slavek, can you handle updating the Debian/Ubuntu packaging files for this change?
Thanks!
Tim