On 03/06/2014 12:14 AM, François Andriot wrote:
Le 06/03/2014 06:45, David C. Rankin a écrit :
On 03/03/2014 02:06 PM, François Andriot wrote:
[...]
Francois,
I'll say it again, "you're good!"
Is the slave in #7 actually sending the "finished" and it never makes it to the job? Or is it not sending "finished" at all?
Is there any possibility that #7 does not occur because the slave does not know where to send "finished"? What links/connects the slave to the job? Is it a signal/slot, or some memory address that the job originally passed to the slave in #3? Or does the slave just generate the "finished" and pass some type of job number along with it after #6??
Could the slave/job connection created in #3 be broken somehow such that the reverse path in #7 no longer exits after the delay in #6?
Please check bug report #1902 : I've posted 2 patches there. If it's confirmed working, I'll explain what I believe is the root cause of this problem.
Francois
Whoop!
After patch and rebuild of tdebase and tdelibs with the patches, I no longer have any stale tdeio_sftp processes hanging around (details posted to bug 1902). Will continue to test, but it is looking good.
XDG_SESSION_ID still does not show proper user session tracking :(