16 Apr
2012
16 Apr
'12
2:41 a.m.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:48 AM, David C. Rankin
<drankinatty(a)suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
On 04/14/2012 01:27 AM, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
But good progress has been made and many code cleanups have occurred along the
way. Many directions were taken only to learn of a better direction to take.
Large projects take a large amount of coordinated manpower. The larger and
more coordinated your manpower, the shorter the time it takes to put the code in
the pristine shape required for the next release. The lesser the manpower and
the less coordinated the team, then the greater the time required to get
everything in shape.
In case of small and not well coordinated manpower the project should
think hardly of its priorities. In this project the goal and essential
priority is Usability. This is about numerous UI bugs and blunders,
subquality work that should be completed. This makes clear direction.
Not mere wandering in woods of code. That will put project in wrong
direction.
Timothy, please, remove TQ -> Q proxying. This direction is not good
and sooner or later will be reverted. Better sooner, less double work.
New York
City.... Git a rope....
>
This TQ circus have taken a year.